|
|
|
|
 |
|
 |
 |
|
AR News
|
|
|
|
14th July 2008
|
Councillors requested to back animal circus ban
http://www.herald.ie/national-news/city-news/councillors--requested-to-back-animal-circus-ban-1432673.html
By Cormac Murphy Monday July 14 2008
Councillors in a second Dublin local authority will be asked to support a ban on circuses which use wild animal acts.
A motion has been tabled at tonight's Dun Laoghaire/Rathdown County Council meeting calling for the introduction of the restriction.
Green Party councillor Nessa Childers wants members to back "bye-laws or other measures which would ensure that circuses which use wild animals are prohibited from performing in any part of the local authority area".
The move comes after councillors in Fingal voted last October to ban the circuses from performing on public land in its area.
Officials in Fingal are still looking into how the vote in favour of the prohibition on wild animal acts can be implemented in practice.
Cllr Childers states in her motion she is seeking the ban "in light of the evidence of suffering endured by the animals involved and the serious animal welfare issues raised".
Ms Childers is sure to draw the wrath of circus bodies. They have already been severely critical of the Fingal vote.
Albert Tyler-Moore of UK-based Entertainment & Leisure Services Association (ELSA) said: "In the press articles it was stated that Clare Daly, the Swords councillor, highlighted the 'well documented evidence of the suffering endured by the animals involved' and went on to say that Ms Daly was calling for the introduction of bye-laws to see the likes of performing monkeys, elephants on bicycles and lions jumping through hoops removed from captivity.
"I am not aware of any well documented evidence of the suffering endured by animals performing in the circus. What I am aware of is a lot of false propaganda issued by so-called animal lovers who amount to nothing more than urban terrorists hiding behind the banner of animal charities, sucking in people just like (Cllr Daly) to help with their attack on the circus community."
But Circus Watch Ireland had congratulated Fingal councillors for passing the motion.
"This is an extremely important first step towards ending the Victorian practice of keeping wild animals in travelling shows, and it reflects the growing opposition in this country to the cruelty of animals which is inherent in all animal circuses," said Nuala Donlon at the time.
Ms Donlon said bans have already been introduced by local authorities throughout both the UK and continental Europe.
|
| |
|
6th July 2008
|
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/world/africa/article4276460.ece
The Sunday Times July 6, 2008
'Germ warfare' fear over African monkeys taken to Iran
Daniel Foggo
Hundreds of endangered monkeys are being taken from the African bush and sent to a "secretive" laboratory in Iran for scientific experiments.
An undercover inquiry by The Sunday Times has revealed that wild monkeys, which are banned from experiments in Britain, are being freely supplied in large numbers to laboratories in other parts of the world. All will undergo invasive and maybe painful experiments leading ultimately to their death.
One Tanzanian dealer, Nazir Manji, who runs African Primates, an animal-supplying company based in Dar es Salaam, said that in recent years he had been selling up to 4,000 vervet monkeys a year to laboratories, charging about £60 each.
Vervets are protected under the Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites). Despite this they are being routinely caught and sold to any buyer prepared to pay.
Another Tanzanian dealer, Filbert Rubibira, was asked last year to prepare an order of monkeys to send to the Chinese military for "scientific purposes". The deal was cancelled at the last minute for reasons that were unclear.
Rubibira told an undercover reporter posing as a buyer that the Cites office in Tanzania would sign permits regardless of what fate awaited the monkeys. "They don't care about that," he said. "If it's for scientific, if it's for the zoo, if the plane is accepted for transport they don't care about that . . . The purpose is not a problem."
Rubibira also indicated that he had no problem if the animals were to be used for cosmetics testing. He said: "We can ask the Cites officer to write [on the certificate] M for medical, scientific purposes, or T for trade purposes. whichever you want."
Manji said scientists at the Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute in Iran had bought 215 vervet monkeys from him this year but he had become suspicious about their true motive, although he was still trading with them. They had "spent a lot of money" on getting the monkeys, even sending over scientists to check on each consignment.
"Iran is very secretive," said Manji, who has been exporting monkeys for 22 years. "They said it [the monkeys] was for 'our country', for vaccine. [They said] 'We don't buy vaccine from anywhere; we prepare our own vaccine'.
"But I think they use it for something else. You know why? Because they don't go on kilos. Iran wants [monkeys weighing] 1.5kg to 2.5kg, [but] 1.5kg for vaccine is not possible."
Rubibira indicated that finding out what the Iranians wanted the monkeys for would be difficult. "They cannot say, you know. They are secretive. They wouldn't tell the truth."
The revelation will fuel speculation that the monkeys may be used for research involving biological weapons. Primates are typically used by scientists wishing to test both the effectiveness of germ warfare agents and defences against them.
The Razi Vaccine and Serum Research Institute, which has its headquarters in Karaj, near Tehran, has been accused in the past by an Iranian opposition group of conducting biological weapons testing.
According to US intelligence, the pharmaceutical industry in Iran has long been used as a cover for developing a germ warfare capability.
In 2005 the US Office of the Director of National Intelligence said Iran "continued to seek dual-use biotechnology materials, equipment and expertise that are consistent with its growing legitimate biotechnology industry but could benefit Tehran's assessed probable BW [biological weapons] programme". Earlier this year it reiterated this.
The Razi institute, which was established in 1925, does legitimate research but does not publicly list on its website the use of primates in any of its current projects. Other animals being used for experiments, such as guinea pigs and mice, are mentioned.
Animal welfare groups called for an immediate inquiry into the revelations. Will Travers, head of the Born Free Foundation, said the captured monkeys would endure "terror and suffering" followed by "possibly painful" experiments and then death.
He said: "Following this Sunday Times exposé, Born Free is calling on the Cites authorities based in Switzerland and the Tanzanian government to immediately investigate exactly what is going on."
Michelle Thew, chief executive for the British Union for the Abolition of Vivisection, said: "The BUAV is appalled by the findings of The Sunday Times. The BUAV renews its call to governments such as Tanzania to protect its indigenous populations of primates and put an end to this unacceptable suffering."
Vervet monkeys, like most other primates, are classed in the Cites appendix II, which stipulates that all the species listed "although not necessarily now threatened with extinction may become so unless trade in specimens of such species is subject to strict regulation". In practice this means that dealers are legally able to sell thousands every year.
However, the use of all wild-caught monkeys in experiments has effectively been banned in Britain since 1997 and the pharmaceutical giant Glaxo-Smith-Kline, which produces a quarter of the world's vaccines, has also stopped using them.
The European Commission is reviewing a directive on the use of animal experiments in Europe which may lead to an EU-wide ban on wild monkeys being used.
The monkeys are caught, or "harvested", by men who first herd them into a tree at dusk.
The catchers then lay a 200m net below the tree and, at daybreak, scare the monkeys out of the branches and into the trap.
Then they are transported 250 miles overland from the main trapping grounds in Arusha near the Kenyan border to Dar es Salaam.
On arrival at Manji's holding farm, where he can accommodate up to 1,000 monkeys at one time, they are transferred into tiny metal cages where they often remain for several weeks. They are then flown in wooden rates on Air Zimbabwe planes to countries such as Iran.
It is unclear exactly which type of vaccine the Razi scientists are claiming to be using the vervets for, but the World Health Organisation guidelines on the production of polio vaccine state that vervet monkeys used for testing it should weigh a minimum of 1.5kg.
However, the monkeys' kidney cells can also be used to produce the vaccine, in which case the weight is not relevant.
Nobody from the institute was available to comment.
BRED FOR LAB
Experiments are carried out on various primates in a number of scientific fields
— Baboons are used for research into the brain, endometriosis and strokes. Vervets are often used for testing the effectiveness of new vaccines
— Monkeys are commonly used to test vaccines for 'biological weapon' diseases such as anthrax and plague
— The World Health Organisation says mice can be used to test the polio vaccine. However, monkeys will still be bought and killed by some scientists to use their kidney cells to create the vaccines
— Experimenting on monkeys caught in the wild was effectively banned in Britain in 1997.Since then permission to use them has required special authority from the Home Office, which has not been granted for 10 years
— Only monkeys bred in captivity are now used for research
— America, Russia, China and Iran are among the countries still using wild monkeys
|
| |
|
4th July 2008
|
http://www.thisislondon.co.uk/news/article-23508199-details/EU+orders+seal+fur+ban/article.do
Clothing made from seal fur is to be banned throughout the European Union.
Although white pelts from baby seals were banned in 1986, fashion houses still use skins from older animals to make boots, coats, gloves and accessories. Stavros Dimas, the EU's environment commissioner, told national ministers in France yesterday that an import embargo will be drawn up within weeks.
Hunters insist that most seals die quickly after being shot. Their critics say many escape to die slowly on the ice or are clubbed unconscious. More than 200,000 seals have been killed in Canada this year - 98 per cent of them pups between two weeks and three months old. Smaller numbers are taken by hunters in Namibia, Norway and Russia. Steven Blaakman, a campaigner with Eurogroup for Animals, said: 'Killing the animals in a humane way is very difficult as seal hunts take place at speed, in inaccessible areas and unstable environments.'
|
| |
|
25th June 2008
|
Spanish parliament to extend rights to apes
http://www.reuters.com/article/newsOne/idUSL256586320080625
25th June 2008 By Martin Roberts
MADRID (Reuters) - Spain's parliament voiced its support on Wednesday for the rights of great apes to life and freedom in what will apparently be the first time any national legislature has called for such rights for non-humans.
Parliament's environmental committee approved resolutions urging Spain to comply with the Great Apes Project, devised by scientists and philosophers who say our closest genetic relatives deserve rights hitherto limited to humans.
"This is a historic day in the struggle for animal rights and in defense of our evolutionary comrades, which will doubtless go down in the history of humanity," said Pedro Pozas, Spanish director of the Great Apes Project.
Spain may be better known abroad for bull-fighting than animal rights but the new measures are the latest move turning once-conservative Spain into a liberal trailblazer.
Spain did not legalize divorce until the 1980s, but Prime Minister Jose Luis Rodriguez Zapatero's Socialist government has legalized gay marriage, reduced the influence of the Catholic Church in education and set up an Equality Ministry.
The new resolutions have cross-party or majority support and are expected to become law and the government is now committed to update the statute book within a year to outlaw harmful experiments on apes in Spain.
"We have no knowledge of great apes being used in experiments in Spain, but there is currently no law preventing that from happening," Pozas said.
Keeping apes for circuses, television commercials or filming will also be forbidden and breaking the new laws will become an offence under Spain's penal code.
Keeping an estimated 315 apes in Spanish zoos will not be illegal, but supporters of the bill say conditions will need to improve drastically in 70 percent of establishments to comply with the new law.
Philosophers Peter Singer and Paola Cavalieri founded the Great Ape Project in 1993, arguing that "non-human hominids" like chimpanzees, gorillas, orang-utans and bonobos should enjoy the right to life, freedom and not to be tortured.
|
| |
|
25th June 2008
|
PRESS RELEASE - HUMAN RIGHTS SCANDAL IN AUSTRIA
Non-governmental organisations express concern about what may be a case of state repression of social activism.
On 21st May 2008 at 6 a.m., heavily armed police officers from an elite unit stormed 21 homes and the offices of a number of non-governmental organisations in Austria. Breaking their way in, the masked police surrounded frightened civilians in their beds at gun point. Ten people were arrested and have been held in custody without specific charge since that day. Despite the statement by the Austrian Federal Ministry of the Interior that "The measures taken by the police (.) were in no way directed against animal welfare or animal welfare organisations", the removal of computers, documents and other assets has effectively crippled some of the organisations involved.
Those asking the media to look at this case draw attention to the fact that Amnesty International (1) and the Austrian Green Party have reacted strongly, questioning police methods and the treatment of detainees, particularly the absence of actionable evidence justifying "strong suspicion" (dringender Tatverdacht) or the "reason (or grounds)" (Haftgrund) for the arrests. Detainee accounts of what has happened are alarming: see, for example, this appeal sent out by Martin Balluch on June 9 (2).
In recent years, milestone reforms in animal law have been achieved in Austria including bans on fur farms, battery cages for hens and the use of wild animals in circuses.
Should those who have achieved advances that are an example to the rest of the world be blamed for all the unsolved cases of damage to property in Austria over the last eleven years?
"All citizens have the right to actively stand up for or demonstrate against something. It is particularly important to stand up for animal rights because animals cannot stand up for themselves. People must do it for them. Animals, like all the defenceless, rely on this protection." (Elfriede Jelinek, Nobel Prize for literature 2004) (3)
Should organisations acting for animals that have always operated peacefully and within the law have their functioning hampered by the seizure of their material?
The undersigned express deep concern at what appears to be an attempt to criminalise the animal advocacy movement and to stifle the political freedom of those involved in it.
(1) Amnesty International statement http://www.vgt.at/presse/news/2008/news20080605_1_en.php
(2) Appeal Martin Balluch http://www.vgt.at/presse/news/2008/news20080613_2_en.php
(3) Elfriede Jelinek http://www.evana.org/index.php?id=34576 http://www.evana.org/index.php?id=34576&lang=en&lang=en
==== Information in German and English is available on the website of the Association Against Animal Factories (Verein Gegen Tierfabriken): www.vgt.at
ENDORSED BY:
National Animal Rights Association Ireland www.naracampaigns.org
|
| |
|
23rd June 2008
|
A Premature Death: The Animal Rights Movement
In her best-selling "Ministry of Healing," Ellen G. White wrote: "What man with a human heart, who has ever cared for domestic animals, could look into their eyes, so full of confidence and affection, and willingly give them over to the butcher's knife? How could he devour their flesh as a sweet morsel?"
Many activists describe themselves as animal rights supporters. How they continue to promote compassionate animal slaughter is beyond my understanding. When King Kong lay bleeding on the streets of New York, having been shot off the Empire State building by 1933 fighter pilots, one of the most famous lines in all of moviedom was used to describe the tragic love story between an 80-foot ape and Fay Wray:
"It was beauty killed the beast."
Many years from now, some future anthropologist writing a doctoral dissertation will discover the identical reason for the death of the animal rights (AR) movement:
Beauty (compassionate animal slaughter) killed the beast (the AR movement).
Throughout history, as long as laws were passed to make human slavery more compassionate, the horror of slavery continued. Anti-slavery advocates danced and celebrated passage of such laws, which were celebrated by liberals and free thinkers, but not by the slaves. To be enslaved is to know and not accept any form of injustice. Similar laws are being passed today to make animal suffering more tolerable on factory farms. The promotion of animal slaughter in any form worsens the betrayal to animals. Compassionate slaughter laws act merely to deceive human meat eaters. Many animal rights advocates raise money to lobby Congress to enact laws making slaughter more compassionate, as if there can ever be justice by sanitizing murder. This summer thousands of animal rights activists will meet at dozens of conferences to support each other and a movement hat in reality, no longer exists. They have lost sight of the fact that the real animal rights movement has died.
Compassionate slaughter does not save animals. Compassionate slaughter relieves the consciences of those people who eat animals.
Why is it that per capita chicken and beef consumption continue to increase? There was a time when animal rights supporters believed that animals deserved ethical treatment from people. The promotion of compassionate slaughter laws has ended the real animal rights movement. Meat eaters have been relieved of any guilt of animal suffering. They donate to animal rights groups who claim victory each time the floor space of a chicken's cage is increased by three or four square inches. It feels good to believe that doomed animals have no pain.
They who should feel guilt now consume more chicken, guilt-free. More animals will die, and they do not do so compassionately. Compassionate slaughter has became the new ethic of the animal rights movement.
Sixty-six years ago, a string quartet performed Paganini and Mozart while doomed Jews marched neatly in line to their final solution in Treblinka's efficient human slaughterhouse. For these victims, slaughter was made more compassionate by adding gentle classical music to their death march. There are still some who suppose that there is no more deviant a notion than the abstraction dubbed "compassionate slaughter." These eccentrics have become the outcasts of the animal rights movement.
The Humane Slaughter Act was passed so that farm animals would be "humanely killed" by compassionate killers with sharp knives, rather then by sadistic fiends taking pleasure in causing pain to defenseless creatures. Oh well, little seems to have changed regarding man's inhumanity to his fellow earthlings.
"Fallaces sunt rerum species." (The appearance of things are deceptive.) Seneca (c4 B.C.-A.D.65)
There is always a home for a cute pure bred dog. The mixed breeds will die. The sheltered pit bulls will be euthanized. The unloved strays will wag their tails and bark greetings of welcome to shelter visitors. Visit your local animal shelter today, and walk down the aisles as I recently did, saying hello and goodbye to living spirits seeking love. To animals who will forever be orphans, until death do they part from the cruelty of their existence.
The rats from animal experiments, when no longer needed, are thrown together into a bucket and doused with ether, or injected with sodium pentabarbitol, en masse, to die huddled together, body to body, in their final resting place.
The baby male chicks are given no painkillers before the life is crushed out of them in efficient killing machines.
The furs that humans wear are skin peeled from once-feeling animals who have been anally electrocuted so that skin remains unscarred.
The horses that lose race after race get no pills to calm them before being stunned more than once, for one blow rarely brings them to their knees, before being hoisted by chains so that a man's knife can end memories of racing around oval tracks to cheering humans.
The chickens and turkeys, one by one, throats slit, hung upside down to squawk their dying words in gurgling blood tones.
The elephants prodded with sharp-hooked tools, made to stand awkwardly on small stools while children applaud with glee.
The castrated dancing bears bring delight to naive circus patrons who have no awareness of their pain, before and after the performance.
The rodeo calves and animals who run in terror as galloping cowboys lasso ropes around their necks and then bind their legs, giving confused animals the opportunity to ask why.
There is no rescue. There is no real sanctuary. There are just illusions. There is only truth.
A few years ago, I listened to Ingrid Newkirk of PETA deliver the most passionate and well-informed talk I had ever heard. Nearly one thousand people rose to their feet for a long and powerful ovation after she had finished. I had the very interesting perspective of sitting right next to Dan Murphy who is the editor of a pro-meat magazine. I love to play poker. I'm a good card player because I watch people carefully, and over the course of an evening's play, I watch tells, I watch faces, I watch eyes, I watch fingers, I watch tapping on the table, and blinking, and by the end of that evening, I know with pretty good certainty the strength of my opponent's cards. I observed this man very carefully during Newkirk's talk. When he applauded, his two friends applauded. He was the leader of the group. When he smiled, they smiled. But what disturbed me was this man gave her a standing ovation too, along with the AR activists. He stood and applauded with enthusiasm. It was then and there that I understood why. Americans are eating more meat as a result of our impotent efforts.
Compassionate slaughter? I reject the concept of compassionate slaughter. I hate the oxymoronic compassionate slaughter laws. If the animals could talk, they would be able to tell you why they reject such laws too. If they were the judges at the trials of Nuremberg, we who pathetically fail to change things and make them worse would be on trial for crimes against these innocent farmed creatures.
I want all people to see death. I want people to see un-compassionate slaughter. I want them to see what it's really like. That's our responsibility. Our responsibility is to accept our failures. More people are eating meat, and what we're doing isn't working. These animals are dying, partially, because of our misdirected efforts. We've got to reject all animal slaughter, even compassionate animal slaughter, making the effort to insist that no animal deserves to die.
Philosophers sometimes lack a touch of the practical. Animal rights philosophers rarely follow the evolution of the animal rights movement to its logical conclusion. We cannot provide sanctuary for every farm animal. Despite the wonderful feel-good work of the good people who run sanctuaries and solicit millions in funding, these rescued animals should not have been born to this earth.
The logical conclusion of our so-called animal rights movement is that these sentient creatures should never be born to suffer. The creatures living out their lives at farm sanctuaries are mere ambassadors representing ten billion other animals who will die this year to feed Americans.
Twenty-seven million animals each day having their throats cut. During the time that it will take you to read this paragraph, over fifteen thousand animals will die. Read the preceding sentence aloud. Fifteen hundred chickens have had their throats slashed, and lay flapping atop each other, choking on their own blood. Should not every American have the opportunity to view that same horrible carnage that we know all to well, over and over again? Does it really matter that each chicken spends her life in a confinement cage containing 3 additional square inches? Save these animals? For what, one might ask? Farm turkeys and pigs can no longer copulate. Males are too large to mount females. Farm "units" have been bred for high protein yield and low bone density. They live lives of pain because their skeletons cannot adequately support their own weight. The compassionate among us would recognize that ending their pain is the ultimate conclusion for all who truly care about suffering. These artificial creatures should never have been engineered nor born.
Today, the animal rights movement is misdirected. We delude ourselves by promoting compassionate slaughter. We make it easy for these animals to live their lives to their own painful and tortured conclusions. We make it easy for meat consumers to veil their collective consciousness. Have you taken note of the fact that meat eating is increasing? Our misguided efforts are partially responsible. We in the movement have made the journey of transition more challenging for meat eaters. We have arrived where we now are, vegans all, by recognizing the horror of slaughter. Groups like the People for Ethical Treatment of Animals, Humane Society, and Farm Sanctuary lobby Congress to change laws making it easier for animals to die. Their laws make it easier for farmed freaks to live longer lives of pain, with the same ultimate conclusion. Their laws relieve the consciences of carnivores.
We on this side of the fence should make it our priority to show the meat-eating public exactly what slaughterhouses produce. The blood. The eyes showing fear, and then pain. Our strategy to relieve suffering relieves a universal conscience. The same strategy that brought us to understand death through violence should be intensified, not lessened. If all animals must die, then all animal eaters must take responsibility for their own participation in the slaughter.
Our current strategy is to deny them their path to truth. In doing so, we provide a rationale for increased meat consumption. If the animals do not suffer, meat eaters reason, then there is no reason not to eat them. It is not for us to spend millions of dollars to lobby members of a judicial body to enact compassionate slaughter laws. It is for us to lobby the hearts and minds of people who still have the ability to see.
Robert Cohen http://www.notmilk.com
|
| |
|
22nd June 2008
|
http://www.directaction.info/news_jun22b_08.htm
reported anonymously:
"the Irish ALF struck again on the night of 21st June '08' targeting a well known animal circus 'Tom Duffy's circus' posters. this particular circus tours Ireland with 6 Bengal tigers, horses, dogs, llamas and advertises on it's posters a zoo that is held after each show. roughly 30 posters were either spray painted or slashed apart with a knife for every animal suffering inside duffys circus
until next time, Irish Alf"
|
| |
|
11th June 2008
|
Swiss court bans work on macaque brains Universities appeal against ruling on animals' dignity.
http://www.nature.com/news/2008/080611/full/453833a.html
Zurich's two largest institutes are appealing to the country's supreme court after a lower court decided to ban two primate experiments studying how the brain adapts to change. They say that the ban is a serious threat to all basic research that uses animals in Switzerland.
The University of Zurich and the Federal Institute of Technology Zurich (ETHZ) announced on 4 June that their local administrative court had ruled against the experiments on rhesus monkeys that had been approved in 2006 by the Swiss National Science Foundation, a funding agency and the Zurich canton's veterinary office, which is responsible for controlling animal welfare.
The veterinary office decision was challenged by an external advisory committee on animal experimentation, which argued that the proposed experiments would offend the dignity of the animals. The requirement to consider the 'dignity of creatures'was introduced into the Swiss constitution in 2004.
The court did not refer to dignity, but agreed that society was unlikely to see the benefits of the research during the three-year funding period approved, and thus the burden on the animals was not justified. Swiss law requires that the benefit to society must be weighed against the burden to animals before any animal experiment can take place.
"But the court has made a new interpretation of the law which demands immediate benefits — and that's not compatible with any form of basic research," says Peter Chen, vice-president for research at ETHZ. "It goes beyond the requirement of the law and we have no choice but to contest the decision in the highest court."
The experiments were to be done at the Institute of Neuroinformatics, jointly owned by the two institutes. One experiment, to monitor changes in the cortex during perceptual learning, involved denying test monkeys a drink for up to twelve hours to increase the value of the apple juice reward they would be offered if they learnt a new task correctly. The other experiment, designed to understand the microcircuitry in the cortex, involved sacrificing the animals to follow the microcircuitry microscopically.
The scientists use primates because their brains are closer to the human brain than any other species. "We need to understand the basic biology of our brains in order to be able to successfully treat brain diseases such as Parkinson's," says Kevan Martin, one of the researchers. He says he intends to re-apply for ethics approval, making the value of the research more explicit.
Roger Lemon, a neuroscientist at University College London, UK, says that finding out how brain circuitry works in normal as well as disease conditions is fundamental if new therapies are to be developed for neurological disorders. "A huge amount of the sort of work that Martin and his colleagues do lies behind the breakthroughs in applications we are now starting to see."
|
| |
|
5th June 2008
|
Who's being caged?
A group of animal rights activists are on hunger strike following police raids in Austria
Victor Schonfeld guardian.co.uk, Thursday June 5 2008
Twenty-five years ago my feature documentary The Animals Film was shown during Channel 4's opening week and later around the world. It placed animal rights on the international agenda and inspired a generation of activists. Today in Austria a group of animal rights campaigners are in their third week in prison on hunger strike after unprecedented nationwide police raids.
At dawn on May 21, Austrian police broke down doors of homes and offices across the country and seized campaigners at gunpoint. Since then, 10 shelter workers, animal welfare teachers and public campaign organizers have been held for more than two weeks under suspicion of membership in "a criminal organization". No charges have been pressed. The detainees are demanding they be charged or released.
One might be forgiven for thinking that unbeknownst to the outside world Austria has been riven by violence from activists desperate for an impact in a society indifferent to their cause. Yet Austria is the most progressive country in the world on animal rights. Laws have passed banning fur farms and wild animals in circuses, and phasing out all battery chicken farms.
These successes are credited especially to the leadership of one of the four hunger strikers - Martin Balluch, president of the Association Against Animal Factories, who has been a passionate advocate of public education and legislative change. Balluch has a double PhD in physics and philosophy and is a former colleague of Stephen Hawking at Cambridge University. In the sixteenth day of his hunger strike, he has been suffering from dizzyness, blurred vision, and stomach pain. When visitors left him yesterday warders locked him in a broom cupboard for several hours. This morning he passed out in the visiting room and guards stood by laughing before carrying him away on a stretcher.
Balluch's lawyer, Stephan Traxler, has been shown excerpts from a police surveillance dossier of several thousand pages concerning minor acts of vandalism against fur shops and food establishments perpetrated by unknown persons over recent years - incidents of windows broken, stink bombs set off and locks glued. In no instance were people hurt or attacked and no evidence linking the vandalism with the detainees has been offered. Traxler says the police action is obviously politically motivated. Animal rights campaigners staged protests yesterday at Austrian embassies in London and two dozen other cities on three continents. Tomorrow Judge Toifle Goster will decide whether to extend the detentions.
It is shocking that such things are happening to human beings in a country at the forefront of animal welfare reform. Whatever the outcome in court, it is the cause of public legal campaigning about animal rights in Europe which has been set back. As Balluch wrote forebodingly some time ago, "the moment the politicians can portray you as terrorists and are believed, they have won this battle, no matter what." When he collapsed this morning he was saying "I simply cannot believe this can happen in Austria."
The police have seized campaign office computers, paper records and mobile phones. The planned launch of an initiative for an Austrian constitutional amendment about animal welfare has had to be postponed. It's hard not to conclude that was the objective of the police action.
"The idea of freedom of expression is threatened in Austria," says Elisabeth Sablik, a zoologist friend of Balluch. "This is not a case about illegal animal rights activities. It is because the movement has been too successful."
|
| |
|
5th June 2008
|
Activists Arrested in Austria
For updates, check: http://www.vgt.at
http://at.indymedia.org/node/10336
On the 21st of May 2008 around 07:00 pm WEGA officers raided several appartments in Vienna. Some of the residents, who had been still asleep, were woken up in their beds at the point of the pistol. At least 14 people in Austria were affected by the raids. Most of them live in Vienna and Graz, one appartment was also searched in Tirol.
In several appartments the doors were kicked in by the WEGA officers. Just like in bad Hollywood movies the officers stormed into the appartments. Only after the residents had been intimidated, “securely” put against the wall, respectively handcuffed, the officers began the searchings.
The grounds for the searchings is the accusation of the formation of a criminal organisation according to §278a StGB. There are warrants of arrest concerning 12 people whose appartments were searched. They are based on danger of collusion, since the persons concerned for example communicated with the help of encoded e-mails, as well as the danger of them committing a crime, because the affected partly have been active in the animal rights scene for a long time. Both arguments directly contradict the presumption of innocence. A criminal organisation is being created absolutely arbitrarily and made responsible for all the unsolved felonies of the last years. The accusations are not backed up by any proof, on the contrary: the executive seemingly hopes to find hints to the affirmation of their suspicion. This suspicion of the formation of a criminal organisation could not and will not be backed up, either by evidence or by speculations.
The affected were directly transferred from their appartments to „Polzeianhaltezentrum“ Rossauer Straße await their arraignment during the next 48 hours. Most of the affected were denied a call to a confidant or a legal representative. Friends who wanted to check on them were denied any dialogue with the affected.
There was no commensurability of the legal act. The early storming of appartments must be characterised as completely overdrawn.
It remains open what the concrete cause for these operations. One should assume that time and manner of the operations have political backgorunds. All in all, disliked political action is being criminalised and made impossible. Should this wave of repression remain unquestioned it will also affect other forms of opposition and action.
The repression of left structures has reached a new peak with yesterday’s wave of raids and arrests. Raids with mummed WEGA officers, who kick in doors and wake sleeping people at the point of the pistol, had not been used against the radical left during the last years. The last time a similar raid was carried out was in 2001 after the “Opernball” demonstrations.
Such an appearance of the authorities does not only count on intimidating th affected. Friends and otherwise politically active people are supposed to be frightened as well. Overdrwan and partly brutal police operations are to convey that opposition does not worthwhile. We must not let ourselves be isolated. Together we can talk about our fears and develop strategies to deal with it.
Solidarity with those affected by the wave of arrests is in demand. No matter if you’re vegan, feminist, anti-Fascist, against observation, atomic power or police force – it addresses all of us even if only few were affected right now. Those people arrested need our support and solidarity. The legal aid is organizing lawyers and media work – get active too!
Organize solidarity parties, donate for legal aid, network, get informed about your rights concerning raids and refusal to give evidence!
|
| |
|
3rd June 2008
|
Dun Laoghaire County Council to vote on Animal Circus Ban
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/87809
It has been brought to our attention that the motion to ban animal circuses (on council-owned land), in Dun Laoghaire, will be voted on next Monday.
Unfortunately though, it appears that a lot of the councillors will be voting against the motion. One reason in particular is that, although they have been receiving emails and letters urging them to vote in favour of the ban, they have only been hearing from either animal-rights activists or people living outside of Dun Laoghaire. As a result, they are not convinced that people living in the area don't want animal circuses.
So, we are asking everyone who lives in the area covered by the Dun Laoghaire-Rathdown County Council, to please contact them again (without affiliating yourself to any animal rights/welfare group or political party), asking them to support the ban, and stating where you live. If you have any friends or family living in the area, please ask them to write in too!
Here are the councillors' email addresses again:
jbailey@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, mbailey@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, mbaker@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, jbyrne@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, bconway@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, louisecosg@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, Gareth.Crowe@oireachtas.ie, aculhane@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, cdevlin@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, jdbyrne@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, cfallon@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, genefeighery@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, tonyfox@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, phand@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, ghorkan@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, tjoyce@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, tkivlehan@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, dmarren@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, tmatthews@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, lmccarthy@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, mmoconnor@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, denisoc@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, tohiggins@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, gokeeffe@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, joleary@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, carriesmyth@cllr.dlrcoco.ie, nbhreathna@cllr.dlrcoco.ie
Many Thanks,
Laura Broxson
National Animal Rights Association
|
| |
|
20th May 2008
|
Animal welfare group opposes election poster
The Irish Times 20-05-08
THEY'VE BEEN used to sell everything from PG Tips to Pepsi - but using chimpanzees to sell a No vote in the Lisbon Treaty is stirring up controversy.
The eye-catching poster by the Dublin-based group Cóir features three chimpanzees with the slogan: "if you say Yes to Lison, you'll see nothing, hear nothing and have no one to speak for you". However, it has drawn sharp criticism from the Captive Animals Protection Society.
"The political posters featuring chimps in different poses are of animals in captivity, likely kept and trained specifically for use in commercials," says Craig Redmond, the society's campaigns manager.
"Their use not only helps continue the use of animals for commercial purposes but also diminishes their status as an endangered species requiring protection."
But Cóir was unrepentant yesterday. Its spokesman Richard Greene defended the poster, saying the campaign was trying to make a serious point about the effects of the Treaty.
"I'm against animal cruelty. In fact, I'm a former Green Party councillor," Greene said. "If anything, these chimpanzees are helping to save democracy, which is a lot more than can be said for Fianna Fáil, Fine Gael and the others."
|
| |
|
19th May 2008
|
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/this-britain/after-75-years-dog-track-has-finally-run-its-course-830574.html
After 75 years, dog track has finally run its course
By Jerome Taylor Monday, 19 May 2008
For 75 years, the pink and green neon-lit sign that crowns the entrance to Walthamstow Stadium in east London has stood as one of greyhound racing's most iconic symbols.
To fans, the venue is one of the finest in the country to watch the sport. For animal rights activists who picket the gates on race nights, it is one of the last remaining bastions of a declining and inhumane pastime.
In August, however, the lights will finally go out at Walthamstow. Falling profits and attendances have forced the stadium's owners to sell the land to developers. Charles Chandler, whose family have owned the course since it opened in 1933, said yesterday: "With all of the principal income streams in sharp decline, and general running costs rising relentlessly, the company's operations have become unsustainable."
The loss of such a prominent stadium will come as a major blow to the greyhound racing industry, which is struggling to attract new punters. Over the past 10 years, at least 20 licensed and independent stadiums have closed for good.
More than four million people ayear bet an estimated £2.9bn on dog racing but, despite enjoying a brief renaissance in the 1990s, the sport has had difficulty keeping up attendances. Changing perceptions of the sport, coupled with punters favouring the betting shops rather than race tracks, has seen the numbers of people going for a "night at the dogs" drop dramatically.
In London, the industry has been hit particularly hard. At the height of dog racing's appeal in the 1950s, up to 100,000 people attended race nights at White City Stadium and the capital boasted more than 30 dog tracks. After Walthamstow closes this summer, only two will be left: Wimbledon and Romford.
Last night, online greyhound racing forums were filled with comments by fans lamenting the closure. "If Walthamstow can be closed down that easily, God help the other stadiums," said one.
Lord Lipsey, chairman of the British Greyhound Racing Board, said that Walthamstow would be sorely missed. "While no one who follows events at Walthamstow will be hugely surprised by this very sad news, it is a great pity to lose one of the sport's flagship venues at a time when attendances at other stadia appear to be increasing. My sympathies go out to the owners, trainers and kennel staff connected to the track, to all the staff, track bookmakers and the racegoers who have helped make greyhound racing at Walthamstow the wonderful experience it is and always has been."
Animal rights activists, who claim greyhound racing is a cruel to dogs, reacted with glee. "We are absolutely delighted to hear the news," said Tony Peters, of the Greyhound Action group. "We have been campaigning outside Walthamstow every weekend for the past year and I would like to think that has had a significant impact on attendance figures."
Animal welfare groups claim that up to 15,000 greyhounds a year are put down after failing to make the grade for racing, while a further 500 die from racing itself. Thousands more are put down after they retire.
A Government report last year into welfare standards within dog racing after a builder from County Durham was discovered to have killed hundreds of dogs on his land for £10 each. The report, by the former farming minister Lord Donoghue, said standards in greyhound racing "needed to change" and called for improvements in dog welfare.
|
| |
|
18th May 2008
|
------------------PRESS RELEASE------------------
The Pearl Brasserie restaurant hoses and threatens peaceful anti-foie gras protesters
Contact National Animal Rights Association Spokesperson: Laura Broxson 086 8729 444
On Saturday 17th May, members of the National Animal Rights Association held a peaceful demonstration outside the Pearl Brasserie restaurant, on 20 Merrion Street Upper, Dublin 2. This was to protest the fact that this restaurant currently serves foie gras, which is made from the forcibly enlarged livers of ducks and geese - a 'delicacy' produced so barbarically, that the production of it is banned in many E.U. States, including Ireland.
"Within minutes of starting the protest, we were sprayed with a hose by the staff of the restaurant, leaving many of us soaked - including a 16year old. The Pearl Brasserie staff found this very amusing - they stood at the windows laughing." Says spokesperson for the group, Laura Broxson
"Then the Patron/Head Chef, Sebastien Masi, came out and started threatening us. Even stating that he'd 'do to us' what is done to the ducks and geese"
"We called the police, and they had to explain Irish law to him - that we've every right to protest, and that he has no right to threaten us" she said.
"The incident hasn't put us off though, it has just revealed to us what type of people we're dealing with. We're more determined than ever to get foie gras out of Ireland, and we will be back to protest the Pearl Brasserie again" she added.
National Animal Rights Association website: www.naracampaigns.org
Foie Gras Facts:
Foie gras is made from the forcibly enlarged livers of ducks and geese. Only males are used for foie gras, because they produce larger livers. Females are killed upon hatching, by being either drowned, beaten or crushed to death.
A long metal pipe is rammed down the throats of these ducks and geese, 2 - 3 times a day, to force-feed them a total of 7lbs of grain. This soon results in their livers swelling to up to 10 times their normal size - which is actually a serious disease called hepatic lipidosis.
The metal pipe sometimes ruptures the oesophagus, causing many birds to die, choking on the blood that then fills their lungs. The amount of feed pumped down their throats causes enormous internal pressure, causing some birds to literally burst. Others become so weak that they are unable to move or die a slow, painful, and premature death by suffocating on the inhalation of regurgitated feed. In fact, because of the massive toll taken on the birds during the force-feeding process, the average pre-slaughter mortality rate is up to twenty times higher than on other poultry factory farms.
In addition to enduring force-feeding, the ducks and geese also suffer the same neglectful and abusive treatment of other factory-farmed animals such as overcrowding and mutilations (their beaks are cut off). They are kept in either group or individual cages, made solely from wire or plastic-mesh. Unable to feel the sun on their backs or ground beneath their feet, their cages are so small that they cannot fully stand or stretch their wings. To make matters worse, they are housed without access to swimming water even though ducks need to be able to immerse themselves in water to remain healthy. Access to water on these farms is so limited that they cannot clean their nostrils and eyes, which can lead to blindness. They have no chance to carry out any of their natural instincts, which include interacting in social groups, keeping themselves clean, nurturing their young, and exploring their surroundings.
After living an unbelievably horrific and painful life, they then have to go through a violent death by having their throats slit whilst hung upside-down.
|
| |
|
8th May 2008
|
'Dog rescuer' guilty of animal cruelty
http://www.independent.ie/national-news/dog-rescuer-guilty-of-animal-cruelty-1369366.html
By Dara deFaoite Thursday May 08 2008
A WOMAN who ran a dog rescue centre has been found guilty of cruelty to more than 40 animals under her care.
Cassidy Sinclair (50) appeared before Portlaoise District Court yesterday on two charges of cruelty to animals.
The court heard that the dogs were living in a 12-inch deep "slurry mixture" of their own excrement and urine and that many of them had open wounds requiring immediate surgery.
Sergeant John Malone, of Abbeyleix Garda Station, told the court that on entering Ms Sinclair's house he "had to go back out a few times on point of vomiting due to the smell of faeces and dog urine."
He said there was a pile of dog faeces in the kitchen measuring two-foot high by four-foot wide and that there were "animal bones scattered on the floor".
Brendan Hughes, animal welfare inspector with the ISPCA said he called to Ms Sinclair's house on March 12 this year.
Mr Hughes said he found 20 dogs living in a compound measuring 20ft by 30ft and a small garden shed.
He said there were also many dogs living in horrific conditions inside Ms Sinclair's house.
Many of the dogs had bite wounds caused through fighting over the bones and that there was no fresh water left out for the animals, he said.
Mr Hughes returned to Ms Sinclair's house the following day accompanied by gardai and a vet and seized 27 dogs.
The ISPCA subsequently seized a further 19 dogs from Ms Sinclair in follow-up searches.
David Fagan, the vet who attended the scene, told the court that 12 of the dogs needed urgent treatment to wounds and that eight required stitches and five required antibiotic treatment for infections.
Mr Fagan said the dogs had been "living in fear and distress" and they had been allowed to "suffer unnecessarily".
Ms Sinclair told the court she had been "running a dog rescue of sorts" and that from January to March of this year "things went berserk".
Help
She said she sought help from rescue groups including the ISPCA but that she did not receive any.
She told the court she "was going nuts" and that people were leaving dogs tied to her gateposts.
Judge Haughton said he had never seen anything like this in his 17-years on the bench and said there was evidence of long-term neglect of the dogs in Ms Sinclair's care.
Hefined Ms Sinclair €500 and prohibited her from keeping any dog again for the rest of her life.
|
| |
|
4th May 2008
|
http://www.guardian.co.uk/science/2008/may/04/foodtech.food
Outrage at European moves to feed animal remains to chickens
• Robin McKie, science editor • The Observer, • Sunday May 4 2008
The European Union is preparing plans to allow pig remains to be used to feed poultry. The practice - banned in Europe after the BSE crisis 10 years ago - would save farmers millions of pounds as prices of cereal feed for chickens soar, say officials in Brussels. But the proposal has outraged animal rights campaigners, Muslim organisations and other groups. They claim the move would put families at risk, offend religious sensibilities and lead to a major consumer backlash.
'There are two million Muslims in Britain and 25 million in Europe and this move would be a disaster for every one of them,' said Dr Abdel Majid-Katme of the Islamic Medical Association. 'This is a sinful idea.' The RSPCA said it had major concerns about the health risks involved, while agriculture experts warned that many consumers would be offended by the idea of a return to the use of animal remains in farm feeds. 'I think there will be such a backlash from consumers that the idea would have to be dropped,' said Tom Acamovic, a nutrition expert based at the Scottish Agricultural College, in Ayr.
His view was backed by supermarket managers. 'Waitrose would not condone this or use feed with animal by-products in our poultry supply chain,' said a spokesman.
The Department for the Environment, Food and Rural Affairs said it would back the move only if proper safety tests were introduced. 'We understand the European Commission will be submitting a proposal later this year,' said a spokesman. 'We would only support it if we were fully satisfied that appropriate and effective testing had taken place to control the use of such proteins in poultry feed.' He added that an EU project looking at testing methods was due for completion in 2009.
In 1994, at the height of the BSE crisis, the EU banned the use of animal remains for farm feedstuffs but under its transmissible spongiform encephalopathies (TSE) road map, published in 2005, outlined proposals that in future some bans might be relaxed. Since then costs of cereals - the basis of poultry feed throughout Europe - have risen dramatically. The EU proposal to mix pig remains with cereals and use them for feeding chickens is linked to these price rises.
Only poultry feed would be exempt from the current ban on the use of animal remains. Chickens are omnivores that eat both vegetation and meat, usually by pecking for worms, officials point out. The practice of feeding the remains of ruminants, mostly cows and sheep, to other ruminants - a process linked to the spread of BSE (mad cow disease) - would still be outlawed.
The proposal was backed by Philip Comer, of DNV Consulting, a former risk assessment adviser for the Food Standards Agency. 'The by- products of slaughter are a very valuable source of protein,' he said. 'We should not be wasting it.'
|
| |
|
4th May 2008
|
http://www.directaction.info/news_may04c_08.htm
Abusers Targeted in Dublin
reported anonymously:
"the irish ALF struck local targets again on the night of may 3rd in Dublin city, Ireland. local fur shops such as sydney vard furriers and 'barnardos' were spray painted with slogans such as 'FUR IS MURDER', 'FUR SCUM' and of course 'A.L.F.' and the locks were glued while 'rohu' furs had their locks glued. 'La Cave' restaurant who sell the cruel 'fois gras' duck/goose liver dish was also targeted with spray paint. Trinity college, openly enact in vivisection, had their science entrance sprayed with 'vivisection is scientific fraud', 'free the animals', 'vivisection-lies' and, 'ALF'. also, a local tattoo parlour, who up until recently before being sold to a new, loving home held a python snake in a small tank and cruel conditions in their studio, had their front window spray painted and their locks glued as pay back for the snake."
|
| |
|
2nd May 2008
|
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-plan-to-protect-right-whale-from-shipping-blocked-by-cheney-819736.html
U.S. plan to protect right whale from shipping blocked by Cheney
A trio of right whales surface in Cape Cod Bay By Leonard Doyle in Washington Friday, 2 May 2008
Efforts to protect the critically endangered North Atlantic right whale from being killed by ships are being blocked by Vice President Dick Cheney according to leaked documents.
A behind the scenes struggle is raging between the White House and US government scientists who want to force ships to slow down near the calving grounds of the almost extinct right whale.
The right whale controversy is the latest example of the Bush Administration sidestepping the advice of its on scientists which are aimed at protecting endangered species or threats to the environment. On Monday, a judge had to order the administration to release its much- delayed decision aimed at protecting the polar bear under the Endangered Species Act.
Only 350 of the whales remain in Atlantic waters off America's eastern seaboard and they are considered one of the most endangered species on Earth. Government scientists warn that the loss of just one more pregnant female is enough to doom the species, which was almost hunted to extinction in the 19th century.
Every year around three right whales are either injured or killed in collisions with ocean-going vessels like containerized cargo ships even though they are protected under the Endangered Species Act. Right whales frequently wash up on shore bearing deep scars from being struck by ships propellers.
To reduce ship strikes the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) decided that ships should restrict their speed to 10 knots or less near whale feeding and calving grounds during parts of the year.
But Mr Cheney's office, which tends to operate in secrecy, sent letters repeatedly questioning whether the rule was needed according to leaked documents. Flatly contradicting the scientific research Mr Cheney's staff argued, "that we have no evidence that lowering the speeds of 'large ships' will actually make a difference."
A critique of the scientists analysis by the administration led to a strongly worded reply in which they said: "The basic facts remain that there is a direct relationship" between a vessel's speed and the likelihood of death or serious injury to the whale, and "at vessel speeds at or below 10 knots, the probability of death/serious injury is greatly reduced."
There was, the scientists wrote, "no basis to overturn our previous conclusion that imposing a speed limit on large vessels would be beneficial to whales."
Congressman Henry Waxman who publicised the correspondence said it was "the latest instance of the White House ignoring scientists and other experts."
A number of European shipping companies have strongly opposed the NOAA proposal, saying slowing their vessels will hurt the economy and cost the industry money. But while the World Shipping Council wants to block the rule, but the largely US Chamber of Shipping of America is in favour and its director of maritime affairs, Kathy J. Metcalf has told the White House that "the economic impacts" of cutting shipping speeds "are well worth the benefits."
The right whales migrate from the Gulf of Maine to warmer waters off Florida and Georgia to give birth. The exhausted mothers, which have not eaten for weeks, then make their way slowly up the coast with their young, passing close by busy shipping ports off Georgia and Massachusetts.
Since NOAA scientists first tried to order ships to reduce speed, at least three right whales have died from ship strikes and propellers have wounded two. Voluntary efforts to get ships to look out for whales known to be in their area have been a total failures, according to scientists who can log their progress by monitoring GPS satellite data.
Beth Allgood, of the International Fund for Animal Welfare, said the refusal by the White House to implement the new speed restrictions were "not a huge burden on industry; it's a huge burden on the whales."
|
| |
|
1st May 2008
|
http://www.practicalfishkeeping.co.uk/pfk/pages/item.php?news=1671
Practical Fishkeeping, 1 May 2008
Swiss legislation to affect aquarium hobby
New animal protection legislation is to come into effect in Switzerland from 1st September 2008.
Fish are to be protected under the new legislation for the first time, following the Swiss government's acceptance of studies showing that, like other animals, fish do suffer.
Other animals covered under the new legislation are to include dogs, cats, cattle, horses, pigs, sheep, guinea pigs, lizards and rhinoceroses.
Under the new legislation, aquariums in Switzerland must not be transparent on all sides, and minimum aquarium and pond size restrictions will be put in place for any fish over the size of 20cm.
Brochure
A brochure outlining the new legislation, available from the Swiss Federal Parliament's website, highlights the importance of maintenance and water quality in the aquarium.
It states that parameters including temperature, oxygen levels and salinity should be correct for the species concerned.
The legislation also covers the social aspect of animal welfare, and it will be considered abuse to keep sociable fish – include goldfish – singularly.
The euthanasia of fish is also dealt with under the new legislation.
From September 1st 2008, it will be illegal in Switzerland to flush a fish down the toilet, or freeze it, as a form of euthanasia.
The legislation states that fish should be stunned before killing using narcotic substances available without veterinary prescription.
Angling
Switzerland's 100,000 anglers will also be affected by the new legislation.
Anglers will be required to demonstrate their expertise by taking a course on humane methods of catching fish, which the government says should be done as gently as possible.
The legislation states that fish caught should be killed immediately following capture with a sharp blow to the head from a blunt instrument.
Otherwise, if the fish are to be detained alive for a short period, then regular water changes should be carried out, and any excessive stress avoided.
The use of barbs and live bait will also be prohibited, except under certain circumstances.
|
| |
|
24th April 2008
|
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/is-it-time-to-give-up-the-search-for-an-aids-vaccine-814737.html
Is it time to give up the search for an Aids vaccine?
After 25 years and billions of pounds, leading scientists are now forced to ask this question
By Steve Connor and Chris Green Thursday, 24 April 2008
Most scientists involved in Aids research believe that a vaccine against HIV is further away than ever and some have admitted that effective immunisation against the virus may never be possible, according to an unprecedented poll conducted by The Independent. A mood of deep pessimism has spread among the international community of Aids scientists after the failure of a trial of a promising vaccine at the end of last year. It just was the latest in a series of setbacks in the 25-year struggle to develop an HIV vaccine. The Independent's survey of more than 35 leading Aids scientists in Britain and the United States found that just two were now more optimistic about the prospects for an HIV vaccine than they were a year ago; only four said they were more optimistic now than they were five years ago.
Nearly two thirds believed that an HIV vaccine will not be developed within the next 10 years and some of them said that it may take at least 20 more years of research before a vaccine can be used to protect people either from infection or the onset of Aids.
A substantial minority of the scientists admitted that an HIV vaccine may never be developed, and even those who believe that one could appear within the next 10 years added caveats saying that such a vaccine would be unlikely to work as a truly effective prophylactic against infection by the virus.
One of the major conclusions to emerge from the failed clinical trial of the most promising prototype vaccine, manufactured by the drug company Merck, was that an important animal model used for more than a decade, testing HIV vaccines on monkeys before they are used on humans, does not in fact work.
This has meant that prototype HIV vaccines which appear to work well when tested on monkeys infected with an artificial virus do not work when tested on human volunteers at risk of HIV – a finding that will be exploited by anti-vivisectionist campaigners opposed to vaccine experiments on primates.
Anthony Fauci, the director of the US National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases (NIAID), near Washington, told The Independent that the animal model – which uses genetically engineered simian and human immunodeficiency viruses in a combination, known as SHIV – failed to predict what will happen when a prototype vaccine is moved from laboratory monkeys to people. "We've learnt a few important things [from the clinical trial]. We've learnt that one of the animal models, the SHIV model, really doesn't predict very well at all," he said.
"At least we now know that you can get a situation where it looks like you are protecting against SHIV and you're not protecting at all in the human model – that's important," he said.
The NIAID spends about $500m (£250m) on HIV vaccine research each year and despite calls from some Aids pressure groups for funds to be diverted to other forms of Aids prevention, Dr Fauci said this was not the time to stop vaccine research. "I don't think you should say that
this is the point where we're going to give up on developing a vaccine. I think you continue given that there are so many unanswered questions to answer," he said. "There is an impression given by some
that if you do vaccine research you are neglecting other areas of prevention. That's not the case. We should and we are doing them simultaneously."
More than 80 per cent of the scientists who took part in our survey agreed that it was now important to change the direction of HIV vaccine research, given the failure of the Merck clinical trial, which was cancelled when it emerged that the vaccine may have actually increased the chances of people developing Aids.
Robert Gallo, a prominent Aids researcher in the US who is credited with co-discovering the virus in the early 1980s, likened the vaccine's failure to the Challenger disaster, which forced Nasa to ground the space shuttle fleet for years.
At the end of last month, Dr Fauci convened a high-level summit of leading HIV specialists at a hotel in Bethesda, Maryland, to discuss the future direction of research. A group of 14 prominent Aids specialists had already written to Dr Fauci suggesting that his institute had "lost its way" in terms of an HIV vaccine.
He said that one outcome of the meeting was a refocusing of the vaccine effort away from expensive clinical trials towards more fundamental research to understand the basic biology of the virus and its effects on the human immune system.
"We'll be turning the knob more towards answering some fundamental questions rather than going into big clinical trials," Dr Fauci said. "I'm certainly disappointed that we're not further ahead in the development of a vaccine but I don't say that this year I'm more discouraged than I was last year. I always knew from the beginning that it would be a very difficult task given what we know about this very elusive virus."
About 33 million people in the world are infected with HIV and some 26 million have died of Aids since the pandemic began.
The majority of scientists who responded to The Independent's survey said that a vaccine would be the most effective way of preventing the spread of the virus given the failure of many education programmes.
Winnie Sseruma, 46: 'For me, the key has been not to give up'
Ms Sseruma says she believes abandoning research for a vaccine would mean a loss of hope for millions of people. "When I was diagnosed, nearly 20 years ago, it was when the first drugs had come on the market. A lot of people had said before then that there was no hope and that all efforts should be put into prevention. But look where we are now. We cannot lose hope; we need to invest in a vaccine."
She says this latest failure needs to be seen as the first hurdle, not a signal to give up. "Yes, the scientists have not been very successful in their quest for a vaccine, but you can learn a lot from failures. Now they have realised they cannot use the normal routes used to develope simpler vaccines."
Ms Sseruma lives in London, but was born in Uganda and says that the current climate of pessimism for the vaccine is not dissimilar to the initial doubts over the likelihood of treating HIV in Africa.
"I remember when treatment started being available in the West and people were saying it would be impossible to send it to Africa. But look what's happened. We should always do whatever is humanly possible to fight Aids. It's been a long journey, but for me, the key has been not to give up, and the scientists need to have the same attitude."
'Philippe B', 42: 'People are getting resistant to drugs'
"Philippe", who wishes to remain anonymous, discovered he was HIV positive 11 years ago. The 42-year-old believes the search for the vaccination should no longer be a priority, but that it should not stop altogether.
"Unfortunately what's happening now is that people are getting more resistant to drug treatment, and more money needs to be put into finding more drugs for treatment," he said.
For people like Philippe, the fear of building an immunity to drugs and running out of options is a real one. He believes that as long as scientists are still pessimistic about the chances of successfully finding a vaccine, money needs to be invested in continuing to fund research into treatment.
"I've already become resistant to five combination treatments over the
last ten years, and if I was on the last one available I'd be very afraid. HIV is not a death sentence in the way it once was, but we do need to fund further research into the drugs that treat it."
Nevertheless, Philippe thinks it is not yet time to abandon all research into a vaccine. "In my lifetime I don't think we'll have a vaccine, but there's no reason we should believe it isn't possible," he said. "But we should now be spending more on other ways of dealing with the disease."
|
| |
|
17th April 2008
|
CAMPAIGNING NEWS - FUR FREE SUCCESSES!
Hi,
During the week, one of our dedicated comrades, Elaine, spotted some real fur-trim items in Sharpsville clothing shop (Fownes Street, Temple Bar, Dublin 2).
She informed the staff and the manager/owner about the cruelty of the fur industry, and as a result, the offending items were immediately removed.
This means that Sharpsville, Flip, HelterSkelter and The Real McCoy - clothing shops which are all located on Fownes Street in Temple Bar - are now fur free (as they are all owned by the same person).
Thanks to Elaine's swift action, there are now 4 more shops in Dublin that say 'No' to the fur trade.
For a fur-free Ireland,
CAFT Ireland / National Animal Rights Association
|
| |
|
16th April 2008
|
http://www.dublinpeople.com/content/view/421/55/
Councillor proposes ban on circus animals
Wednesday, 16 April 2008
A councillor on the Southside is proposing that her local authority should follow the example of other councils around the country and ban the use of circus animals in public areas.
Cllr Nessa Childers (GP) will table a motion at next month's Dun Laoghaire Rathdown council meeting to ban the use of circus animals in live shows on council owned land.
Last October Fingal County Council became the first local authority in the country to pass a motion recommending a ban on circuses using wild animals on public land. Councillors in Cork city also backed the same motion two weeks ago.
Cllr Childers represents an area of Dublin that is synonymous with circuses. Circus Field in Booterstown has hosted shows by leading companies for the last 50 years.
Cllr Childers urged people to think about the welfare of the animals when a circus comes to their area. "I would like them to think about what is really happening to the animals inside," she said. "With the very best intentions, travelling act circuses simply cannot provide for the animals in their care.
"Circuses say they love their animals, but it's a business for them. Animals in circuses are not volunteers, they have been deprived of their precious freedom for a lifetime of cheap tricks."
She said that two investigations into Irish circuses from 2000 and 2003 and as recently as 2006 raised serious concerns for the animals. Cllr Childers claimed the investigations uncovered cramped, dirty conditions and miserable, unhealthy looking animals while public safety was also highlighted.
A spokesperson for the National Animal Rights Association (NARA), Laura Broxsin, said it would be a great victory for animal rights if the motion was passed. "The animals are not trained with sugar lumps and treats," she said.
"They are beaten into submission and only perform through fear. A lot of the times these animals hurt themselves because they are driven mad. They are also forced to live out the rest of their lives in torture and misery just for the entertainment of people. We think people should know better."
Blackrock based Progressive Democrats activist and former councillor, Victor Boyhan, has also called on the council to rethink its policy. In January 2000, he led a campaign within the council for a similar ban and a motion he tabled was defeated by just one vote. "Animals kept in travel trucks suffer as such restricted confinement contributes to mental torture," he said. "We share our planet with a wide range of creatures. I believe it is our responsibility to treat them humanely."
However, another councillor from Blackrock, Niamh Breathnach, said she would not support the motion and remarked that many people had fond childhood memories of circuses.
"I have attended circuses all my life," she said. "We have a visiting vet and we have animals that have very close relationships with their trainers. It is a way of life. "As long as I am satisfied that the animals are inspected and in good condition, I just wish the circuses well."
Duffy's Circus, who recently ended a two week run of shows at Booterstown, also proudly defended its track record in relation to animal welfare. The owner of the circus, David Duffy, said no allegations of abuse were ever made against his company.
"We look after these animals," he insisted. "They are in our care and yes we earn our living with them but likewise they earn their living with us. They are well looked after, they are well treated and well fed. If they get any sort of ailments we look after them.
"I would say that there has never been an allegation of mistreatment or abuse against anybody at Duffy's Circus and I would welcome anybody that wants to come down and talk to us about the issue."
|
| |
|
14th April 2008
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/europe/7341211.stm Monday, 14 April 2008 08:16 UK Russia tests monkeys for Mars trip
By Sima Ayvazian BBCRussian.com, Sochi
Monkeys previously orbited Earth in the Bion capsule.They won't utter Yuri Gagarin's famous phrase "Let's go!" But the monkeys of Sochi have already proven their worth as trailblazers in space - and now they are being groomed for a trip to Mars.
The macaques will be the first to experience the radiation that poses a big risk to astronauts - or Russian cosmonauts - on any flight to the Red Planet.
The Sochi Institute of Medical Primatology, at Vesyoloye near the Black Sea, has a proud history of involvement in the Russian - formerly Soviet - space programme.
"People and monkeys have approximately identical sensitivity to small and large radiation doses," explains the institute's director, Boris Lapin. "So it is better to experiment on the macaques, but not on dogs or other animals."
The institute will select macaques that may eventually fly to Mars before humans do. After two years of experiments the most suitable 40 monkeys will be sent to the Institute of Biomedical Problems in Moscow, where scientists study aerospace biomedicine. Experiments on the monkeys will be carried out at the same time as the Mars-500 project. That project - due to start early next year - is aimed at simulating the conditions of interplanetary flight. Volunteers will have to spend 17 months in a mock-up "spaceship" in Moscow
Monkeys may touch down on boulder-strewn Mars before humans But a real expedition to Mars is not likely to happen for another 10 years at the very least.
Gruelling mission
In addition to the effects of radiation, space scientists want to see how the monkeys react to prolonged weightless conditions, isolation and a special diet of juices and pureed food. Mars-500 director Viktor Baranov says 520 days "are enough for the flight to Mars - 250 days to fly there, 250 days to come back and a month for the landing on Mars".
Today Russia is one of the few countries where experiments on primates are carried out.
"Humanity sacrifices more than 100 million animals a year in the name of health and beauty. It's time to think of an alternative to experiments with animals," says Andrei Zbarsky of the international nature conservation group WWF.
The son of space veteran Krosh may one day fly to Mars "I'm sure scientists will repeat the story of Laika, the first dog in space. Today it's no secret that the dog died from the nervous stress immediately after the rocket launch and its dead body revolved in orbit for two weeks."
Mr Lapin admits that his institute has received some objections from European colleagues concerned about the animal experiments. A researcher at the institute, Anaida Shaginyan, says "certainly, I feel sorry for the monkeys, they might die, but the experiments are necessary to preserve the lives of the cosmonauts who will fly to Mars in future".
Veteran cosmonauts
The institute has a breeding programme for the macaques, so it is not necessary to catch them in the wild. Twelve macaques have flown in Russian and Soviet spaceships on previous missions.
Krosh flew in space in 1992 and is still in rude health Abrek and Bion were the first into space, in December 1983. After a five-day flight they landed in Kazakhstan and after rehabilitation returned to the pack.
Two years later the monkeys Verny and Gordy spent seven days in space. In 1987 Dryoma and Yerosha spent two weeks in orbit. After returning from space Dryoma was presented to Cuban leader Fidel Castro. After that there were three two-week flights: in 1989, 1992 and 1996. Then the project stopped - Russia did not have enough money for the programme. Now experiments are conducted on Earth under conditions which simulate weightlessness.
Sixteen-year-old space veteran Krosh is a star of the institute. "Old man Krosh is about 60 years old, if we translate his monkey age to a human life span. He is very active. He responds well to food and is aggressive with his female partners," says Ms Shaginyan. "After rehabilitation he produced offspring. And that's proof that spaceflight did not harm his health," she added.
|
| |
|
14th April 2008
|
Namibia - EU Has Decided to Ban Seal Product Imports
Namibian seals herded in the background, to await clubbing of 85,000 baby seal pups
The EU's environment chief Stavros Dimas will propose to ban imports of all seal products resulting from culls where animals suffer. The ban would apply to all seal products including furs, skins and health products including vitamins. Canada, Greenland and Namibia accounted for approximately 60% of all seals killed in 2006, the according to the EFSA report.
Namibia's seal cull of 85 000 Appendix II, UN Convention in Trade of Endangered Species (CITES) is the second largest, most cruelest and is the only sealing country still slaughtering nursing baby seal pups.
A practice out-lawed around the world, even by sealing countries.
Baby Cape fur seal skins were first exported to the United States, until the US introduced specific legislation banning these imports in 1972, due to the inhumanness of this slaughter. Namibian sealers then moved exports to EU. Where since Namibian independence in 1990, has grown over 700%, from 9000 culled seal pups to 85 000, whilst the seal population has declined by more than half.
I am extremely pleased, writes Francois Hugo of Seal Alert-SA, that this 27-nation EU Seal Ban will be joining the '72 US Seal Ban. It will be the death blow for Namibia's two-man sealing industry, and their part-time unskilled 120 seal clubbers.
Its time these cardboard shack dwelling 'Seal Clubbers' rather protect seals than slaughter them, and secure deceit jobs in the growing seal eco-tourism industry that can afford them proper housing, and I challenge government to make these opportunities available to them.
It has taken Seal Alert-SA just under two years to bring about a full EU Seal Product Import ban for the Cape fur seals.
The question is will the Namibian Prime Minister publicly announce an end officially to the 'Last Baby Seal Cull' on earth?
I trust Namibia will respond positively before the start of the 2008 sealing season in July, as already tourists are reporting the mass death of numerous baby seals washing onto the beaches, the alternative would be for Seal Alert-SA to intensify its European Tourism to Namibia boycott.
See : http://www.nationalpost.com/news/story.html?id=443397 and http://allafrica.com/stories/200801030803.html
For the Seals Seal Alert-SA www.sealalert.org
|
| |
|
7th April 2008
|
http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/navy-sonar-blamed-for-death-of-beaked-whales-found-washed-up-in-the-hebrides-805399.html
Navy sonar blamed for death of beaked whales found washed up in the Hebrides
INDEPENDENT GRAPHICS
Anti-submarine sonar may have killed a group of whales found dead in the Hebrides in one of Britain's most unusual strandings, scientists believe.
Five Cuvier's beaked whales, a species rarely seen in British waters, were discovered on beaches in the Western Isles on succeeding days in February. Another animal from a related species was discovered at the same time.
Experts consider such a multiple stranding to be highly abnormal. They calculate, from the state of the carcasses inspected that the whales died in the same incident out in the Atlantic to the south and west of Britain, and then drifted towards the Scottish coast over two or three weeks.
The main suspect in the case is sonar, as it is known that beaked whales are highly sensitive to the powerful sound waves used by all the world's navies to locate underwater objects such as submarines.
Groups of beaked whales have been killed, with sonar suspected as the direct cause, several times in recent years; well-documented incidents include anti-submarine exercises in Greece in 1996, the Bahamas in 2000 and the Canary Islands in 2002. In 2003, an American judge banned the US Navy from testing a new sonar after a court case brought by environmentalists to protect marine life.
Britain's Whale and Dolphin Conservation Society has now submitted a Freedom of Information request to the Ministry of Defence over the Hebridean strandings, with the aim of finding out if any Royal Navy activity coincided with the possible location and timing of the whales' deaths. So far, the MoD has provided no answers, but it is possible that other navies might have been involved.
The 21 species of beaked whale include some of the world's most rarely seen mammals; they are also the deepest-diving air-breathing animals. A Cuvier's beaked whale set the record for a deep dive two years ago: 1,899 metres, or 6,230ft, beneath the surface, holding its breath for an astonishing 85 minutes.
The animals use these deep dives to forage, but when sonar gets involved, their remarkable habit may be their undoing. One theory is that the whales are so distressed by the intensely loud sound waves that they return too quickly to the surface, and in doing so, fatally suffer "the bends" – the formation of nitrogen bubbles in the blood which can kill human divers.
The Hebridean strandings began when a Cuvier's beaked whale was found dead on the beach at Saligo Bay, Islay, on 2 February; three days later another washed up on nearby Machair beach. On 7 February a third was found further north, on the island of Tiree, and the following day a fourth carcass, probably a beaked whale but washed away before it was identified, was found on neighbouring Mull. On 12 February a fifth animal was found further north at Gobhaig on Lewis. A Sowerby's beaked whale was also found, at Benbecula, to the south of Lewis, the day before.
One man deeply concerned at the deaths is Professor Ian Boyd, the director of Britain's Sea Mammal Research Unit, based at the University of St Andrews. Professor Boyd is the chief scientist on an American project investigating beaked whales' sensitivity to underwater sound.
"The beaked whales have a problem with military sonar, and these strandings on the west coast of Scotland are very suspicious," he said. "The chances of them happening through natural causes are really quite small. It's likely that the animals died together in a single event, and also, it's quite likely that ... they were not the only ones which died." He added: "We don't yet have the evidence to make a direct connection with anti-submarine exercises, but there are enough examples of events like this to make it likely."
Professor Boyd asked the Proudman Oeceanographic Laboratory in Liverpool to model the whales' possible drift to find the location of the initial incident.
Secretive creatures
*The beaked whales, so-called because of their "snout", are the second- largest family of the cetaceans (whales and dolphins) but less is known about them than almost any other group of large mammals; some are known only from carcasses and have hardly ever been seen alive. They broke into the headlines in January 2006 when one of the 21 beaked whale species, a northern bottlenose whale, swam up the Thames into London. It died on the barge that was transporting it to possible freedom. The beaked whales are capable of deep vertical dives to 6,000ft and more to hunt for prey by echo-location.
|
| |
|
4th April 2008
|
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/7329692.stm
A "mass grave" of more than 40 animals has been discovered on a County Down farm.
Hundreds of animals were found in squalid conditions, with many already dead and others had to be put down.
The USPCA and police raided the farm near Katesbridge after receiving a tip-off that animals were being kept in cruel conditions.
More than 300 pigs and cattle were found. The USPCA is going to court to seek an order to remove the animals.
The USPCA, said while the livestock was generally healthy, it was being kept in appalling conditions.
Some of the animals were standing in 8 ins of water at the premises at Ballyroney Road.
'Very difficult'
Stephen Philpott of the USPCA said: "The entire farm was heavily stocked, it was over-crowded, there were no welfare standards at all on the farm," he said.
"Unfortunately, on our first sweep through the farm our vet had destroy animals and try and relieve suffering as best we could.
"We then had to try and thin out some of the animals and move them to other housing.
"We had to get emergency food and water and try and clean some of the buildings.
"That was very difficult to do. And then we discovered what we believed to be a mass grave."
The USPCA said it believed it knows the family responsible for the farm.
Several have convictions for animal cruelty and are banned from keeping livestock.
Inspectors spoke to a member of that family. He told them that while he fed the animals, he did not own them and he did not know who did.
|
| |
|
3rd April 2008
|
http://www.independent.ie/national-news/orangutan-goes-ape-on-the-great-escape-1335721.html
Orang-utan goes ape on the great escape
By Ed Carty Thursday April 03 2008
An adventurous orang-utan went on-the-run yesterday in Dublin Zoo, making a bold bid for freedom after 24 years in captivity.
Maggie left her baby Mujur behind and managed to enjoy an hour on the loose wandering around in front of her enclosure.
Zookeepers believe the 26-year-old ape made a long stretch for branches at the edge of the compound, grabbed a wall and climbed over at around midday.
Zookeepers
The alarm was raised within minutes, but it was an hour before zookeepers managed to confront Maggie and shoot her with a tranquilliser dart gun.
A group of 26 schoolchildren and their two teachers from Scoil Mhuire gan Smal in Dublin's Inchicore raised the alarm after Maggie escaped.
They had been admiring the other two adult orang-utans when one of the 12-year-olds spotted the ape on the loose only yards away.
Maggie had climbed the perimeter wall of her enclosure and was standing in front of a neighbouring compound housing snow leopards.
Zookeepers were on the scene within minutes to marshall the youngsters away from the area.
But within the hour Maggie had been tranquilised and was safely back in the compound.
A spokeswoman for the zoo said Maggie spent the evening sleeping off the effects of the sedatives.
"Having been in the same habitat for 24 years she seemingly decided she would make her way out,'' the zoo spokeswoman said.
"She reached branches, climbed a wall and spent around one hour wandering about the vicinity of the enclosure.''
It is not known why the normally protective Maggie, who weighs a trim 34 kilos, decided to leave two-and-a-half-year-old baby Muhur behind. Dublin Zoo said there had not been any rows or fights involving the other two adult orang-utans in the enclosure.
Orang-utans are not considered aggressive animals and the zoo stressed that no visitors were in any danger.
Dublin Zoo management will carry out an investigation into the escape in the coming weeks.
|
| |
|
1st April 2008
|
From the Captive Animals Protection Society:
1 April 2008
Cork City Council bans animal circuses!
Thank you to all of you who yesterday contacted Cork City Councillors, asking them to support the vote last night to ban animal circuses.
We are pleased to report that the vote went well and the motion was passed.
This makes Cork City Council the latest council to ban animal circuses from using council-owned land.
Thank you to members of CAPS' e-mail list who alerted us to this vote. If you are aware of any councils meeting to vote on this issue please do let us know as soon as possible. The more time we have the greater the opportunity that we can provide all councillors with up to date and detailed information on animal circuses in Ireland.
Although CAPS is based in the UK we work closely with animal protection organisations throughout the whole of Ireland and are the major source of information on the issue.
Our campaign website www.irishcircuses.org will be updated this week with the news on Cork council's vote.
Thanks for your support.
The Captive Animals' Protection Society PO Box 4186, Manchester, M60 3ZA, UK Tel: 0845 330 3911 www.captiveanimals.org www.irishcircuses.org
|
| |
|
26th March 2008
|
Irish animal rights group calls for closure of fur farms
SEÁN Mac CONNELL, Agriculture Correspondent
http://www.ireland.com/newspaper/ireland/2008/0326/1206144724814.html
|
| |
|
24th March 2008
|
Leading high street retailer Marks and Spencer has adopted the strict fixed cut-off date policy on animal testing for beauty products, the benchmark for cruelty- free cosmetics and toiletries.
http://www.naturewatch.org/news/M_and_S.asp
|
| |
|
22nd March 2008
|
-----------------------------PRESS RELEASE----------------------------------
http://www.indymedia.ie/article/86807
N.A.R.A. receives communique from ALF on Fur Farm Raid
Contact Spokesperson/Press Officer: Laura Broxson, 086 8729 444
The National Animal Rights Association has today received the official communique regarding the recent raid on Vasa Ltd. Fur Farm in Co. Laois (see below for the report). We were also told that there will be photos sent to us - which we will release as soon as we receive them.
"This is a great victory for animal rights in Ireland" Says spokesperson for N.A.R.A., Laura Broxson
"As a result of the action, 300 mink now actually have the chance to live out the rest of their lives - they're finally free.
The fur farming industry is Ireland's secret shame, we find it absolutely disgusting that there are such ''farms'' in this country.
The liberation that occurred has come at a great time too - the Government is currently drafting an Animal Welfare Bill, which could finally put an end to fur farming here, so what happened will certainly highlight the issue.
Our group doesn't encourage people to break the law or engage in any illegal activity whatsoever, but we fully support the ALF and those who are brave enough to risk their lives, and freedom, to help animals." she said.
"Animals are no different from people - they are living, breathing, sentient beings who deserve the right to life and freedom as much as we do. And I think a lot of the Irish public are finally starting to see this. There are a lot of compassionate people in this country, so we are not surprised at all by the action that took place" she added.
THE COMMUNIQUE:
Last weekend, the Irish Animal Liberation Front visited Ireland's largest fur farm - Vasa Ltd, in Co. Laois.
The ALF made their way through the locked gate in a matter of seconds, and then the real fun started...
A quick scan of the area showed that the sheds were enclosed in an area secured by corrugated steel. No problem - a huge hole was then cut into this, the wire mesh behind it snipped, and the hedgerow behind that was then cleared - to allow the Mink easy access to the river running beside this concentration camp.
Graffiti was sprayed all around the place, including the signature ''ALF'' calling card.
300 breeding cards were removed from one of the sheds, and then destroyed.
Moving onto the next shed, 300 Mink were liberated and were then guided to freedom, before the ALF disappeared into the darkness. It was unbearable to have to leave the others behind.
Una and Michael Heffernan are responsible for murdering over 45,000 Mink on this death camp every year. It's time to make them pay for this.
The ALF will be back, Una and Michael - and don't think that the cows and horses you keep locked up too were unnoticed.
Until all are free, ALF Ireland
|
| |
|
20th March 2008
|
Irish Mink farm targeted by animal rights group By: Joe Barrett
http://www.laois-nationalist.ie/news/story/?trs=cwqlqlauau&cat=news
|
| |
|
19th March 2008
|
Six charged over animal extremism (UK)
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/7305717.stm
|
| |
|
7th March 2008
|
Swiss to ban cat fur trade after pets vanish
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/main.jhtml?xml=/news/2008/03/07/wcatfur107.xml
|
| |
|
3rd March 2008
|
Sea Shepherd News:
Sea Shepherd Ship Steve Irwin Engages Japanese Factory Ship Nisshin Maru In Whale Sanctuary
http://www.seashepherd.org/news/media_080302_1.html
|
| |
|
2nd March 2008
|
Vets' secret trade in dog body parts: A clinic that makes money out of putting down healthy animals
http://www.timesonline.co.uk/tol/news/uk/article3466712.ece
|
| |
|
26th February 2008
|
The USPCA has moved against a man who allowed people to be photographed with his pet tiger at the dangerous animals pound he ran for the charity.
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/northern_ireland/7265792.stm
|
| |
|
25th February 2008
|
South Africa announces elephant cull
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/africa/7262951.stm
|
| |
|
19th February 2008
|
Ireland's Ward Union wins right to hunt stags in High Court decision
http://www.horseandhound.co.uk/competitionnews/392/181585.html
|
| |
|
18th February 2008
|
Shark-fin soup trade threatens hammerheads
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/science/sharkfin-soup-trade-threatens-hammerheads-783548.html | | | | |